As with its initiatives in Syria, Russia’s efforts to take centre-stage in the Afghan political process were nipped in the bud. Early in August, the Russian MFA announced the convening of a second round of Afghanistan consultations in the “Moscow format” on September 4. The first round, held in April 2017, included Russia, Afghanistan, India, Pakistan, Iran, China and the five Central Asian Republics. The US was invited, but did not attend. The Taliban had also been invited and had declined. The same invitees were addressed again, but this time, the Russian MFA said, the consultations would be co-hosted by Russia and Afghanistan and the Taliban had confirmed attendance. The Russians pointed out that the Americans, including a senior State Department official, had met with Taliban representatives in end-July and that the Uzbek government had held more detailed talks with the Taliban, probably at the instance of the US (which has recently been hailing the Uzbek contribution to the Afghan peace process).

The United States again declined the invitation, on the ground (according to Russian officials) that it would not be consistent with the US position that such talks should be Afghan-led. The co-host Afghanistan then apparently sent a message to the Russians that Afghanistan would not attend, unless direct talks between the Taliban and the Afghan Government was arranged on the side lines of the Moscow consultations. Then followed the abrupt resignations of the Afghan NSA Hanif Atmar, the intelligence chief and the Defence and Interior Ministers. Following this was a telephone call from Afghan President Ghani to Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov (!) in which (according to a Russian MFA read-out), he supported the idea of the Moscow meeting, but proposed postponing it to later, mutually convenient, dates – “due to the need to develop Afghanistan’s consolidated position on this issue, taking into account the ongoing personnel changes in the leadership of the Afghan ruling bloc”.

The Russians alleged that the United States was shutting Russia out of the peace process, so that it could exclusively pursue a settlement with the Taliban that would safeguard continued US military presence in the country. At the same time, they interpreted President Ghani’s phone call as his acknowledgement of Russia’s legitimate role in the process. Separately, the Russian MFA yet again pointed to flights by “unidentified” helicopters in northern Afghanistan delivering arms to ISIS militants near Central Asian borders. This has been a persistent refrain of Russian security officials for nearly three years now – that militants of Central Asian origin are being armed, trained and massed across the Central Asian borders in Afghanistan for use against Russia.


August 30, 2018

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Ananta Centre to add comments!

Join Ananta Centre

About the Author

Ambassador PS Raghavan

Chairman, National Security Advisory Board & Former Indian Ambassador to Russia

Born in 1955, Ambassador Raghavan holds a B.Sc. (Honours) degree in Physics and a B.E. in Electronics & Communications Engineering. He joined the Indian Foreign Service in 1979. From 1979 to 2000, he had diplomatic assignments in USSR, Poland, United Kingdom, Vietnam and South Africa, interspersed with assignments in the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) in New Delhi. From 2000 to 2004, he was Joint Secretary in the Indian Prime Minister's Office dealing with Foreign Affairs, Nuclear Energy, Space, Defence and National Security. Thereafter, he was Ambassador of India to Czech Republic (2004 - 2007) and to Ireland (2007 - 2011).

He was Chief Coordinator of the BRICS Summit in New Delhi (March 2012) and Special Envoy of the Government of India to Sudan and South Sudan (2012-13). Ambassador Raghavan conceptualized and piloted the creation of the Development Partnership Administration (DPA) in MEA, which implements and monitors India’s economic partnership programs in developing countries, with an annual budget of $1-1.5 billion. He headed DPA in 2012-13. From March 2013 to January 2014, he oversaw the functioning of the Administration, Security, Information Technology and other related Divisions of MEA. Since October 2013, he was also Secretary [Economic Relations] in MEA, steering India’s bilateral and multilateral external economic engagement. Ambassador Raghavan retired from the Indian Foreign Service in January 2016, after serving from 2014 as Ambassador of India to Russia. Since September 2016, he is Convenor of the National Security Advisory Board of the Government of India.

You need to be a member of Ananta Centre to add comments!

Join Ananta Centre

Featured Video